https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363474 The Tribunal held that the denial of CENVAT Credit on input services related to exported output services was not justified. It found a clear nexus between certain services and the output service provided by the Assessee, which was exported. The Tribunal also ruled that the absence of the registered office address on invoices did not invalidate the CENVAT Credit if the services were utilized for the business. Consequently, the Tribunal partly allowed the Assessee's appeal by denying credit on specific services and dismissed the Revenue's appeals. en-us Mon, 14 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 13 Jul 2018 06:12:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363474 The Tribunal held that the denial of CENVAT Credit on input services related to exported output services was not justified. It found a clear nexus between certain services and the output service provided by the Assessee, which was exported. The Tribunal also ruled that the absence of the registered office address on invoices did not invalidate the CENVAT Credit if the services were utilized for the business. Consequently, the Tribunal partly allowed the Assessee's appeal by denying credit on specific services and dismissed the Revenue's appeals. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 14 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363474