<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 777 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363469</link>
    <description>Retrospective Rule 57CCC, read with Section 69(2) of the Finance Act, 2010, regularised reversal of Modvat credit attributable to exempted final products, so the disputed credit demand and penalty did not survive once the credit had been reversed. The scheme was treated as covering the relevant period, and the delay in making the reversal-related application was treated as condonable because the assessee was pursuing the matter before the Tribunal. However, interest remained payable for the intervening period between clearance of the goods and actual reversal of the credit, and that interest demand was sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2018 06:12:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=526774" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 777 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363469</link>
      <description>Retrospective Rule 57CCC, read with Section 69(2) of the Finance Act, 2010, regularised reversal of Modvat credit attributable to exempted final products, so the disputed credit demand and penalty did not survive once the credit had been reversed. The scheme was treated as covering the relevant period, and the delay in making the reversal-related application was treated as condonable because the assessee was pursuing the matter before the Tribunal. However, interest remained payable for the intervening period between clearance of the goods and actual reversal of the credit, and that interest demand was sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363469</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>