<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 775 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363467</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the job worker against the denial of Cenvat credit on inputs not in their name, holding that the appellant was entitled to avail the credit as they had used the inputs in manufacturing final products. The Tribunal referenced previous decisions and the Union of India vs. Marmagoa Steel Ltd. case to support their ruling, setting aside the order denying the Cenvat credit and granting any consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2018 06:12:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=526772" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 775 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363467</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the job worker against the denial of Cenvat credit on inputs not in their name, holding that the appellant was entitled to avail the credit as they had used the inputs in manufacturing final products. The Tribunal referenced previous decisions and the Union of India vs. Marmagoa Steel Ltd. case to support their ruling, setting aside the order denying the Cenvat credit and granting any consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363467</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>