<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 773 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363465</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that the appellant was entitled to the credit of duty paid by the input supplier on the Pig Lead Ingots. Relying on legal precedents, the Tribunal emphasized that if duties are accepted without dispute, the credit should not be denied to the purchaser meeting all conditions for availing CENVAT credit. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief, if any, as per law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2018 06:12:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=526770" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 773 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363465</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that the appellant was entitled to the credit of duty paid by the input supplier on the Pig Lead Ingots. Relying on legal precedents, the Tribunal emphasized that if duties are accepted without dispute, the credit should not be denied to the purchaser meeting all conditions for availing CENVAT credit. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief, if any, as per law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363465</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>