https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363463 The tribunal upheld the impugned order, rejecting the appeal as the appellant failed to prove that the duty burden had not been passed on to customers, evidenced by the inclusive MRP on product labels. The decision emphasized the significance of establishing the non-inclusion of duty in the MRP to successfully claim a refund, citing the doctrine of unjust enrichment. en-us Fri, 25 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 13 Jul 2018 06:12:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363463 The tribunal upheld the impugned order, rejecting the appeal as the appellant failed to prove that the duty burden had not been passed on to customers, evidenced by the inclusive MRP on product labels. The decision emphasized the significance of establishing the non-inclusion of duty in the MRP to successfully claim a refund, citing the doctrine of unjust enrichment. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 25 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363463