https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273769 The appeal was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi, due to the continuous absence of the appellant and lack of representation. Despite multiple notices and requests for adjournments, the appellant and their representative failed to appear on the final date. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of diligence in legal matters and dismissed the appeal for default, citing the maxim "VIGILATIBUS ET NON DORMIENTIBUS JURA SUB VENIUNT." The order was pronounced in open court, finalizing the dismissal. en-us Wed, 31 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 09 Sep 2022 14:07:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273769 The appeal was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi, due to the continuous absence of the appellant and lack of representation. Despite multiple notices and requests for adjournments, the appellant and their representative failed to appear on the final date. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of diligence in legal matters and dismissed the appeal for default, citing the maxim "VIGILATIBUS ET NON DORMIENTIBUS JURA SUB VENIUNT." The order was pronounced in open court, finalizing the dismissal. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 31 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273769