<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (10) TMI 79 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13663</link>
    <description>Section 220(2A) interest waiver requires the authority to consider the assessee&#039;s financial position, hardship, and relevant surrounding circumstances, and the decision will not be interfered with unless it is shown to be unreasonable or based on irrelevant considerations. On the facts noted, the Commissioner considered the assessee&#039;s immovable properties, rental and agricultural income, and prior adjustments against earlier dues before refusing waiver. As the record showed application of the relevant factors and no material indicating arbitrariness or unjustness, the refusal to waive interest was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 17:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=52672" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (10) TMI 79 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13663</link>
      <description>Section 220(2A) interest waiver requires the authority to consider the assessee&#039;s financial position, hardship, and relevant surrounding circumstances, and the decision will not be interfered with unless it is shown to be unreasonable or based on irrelevant considerations. On the facts noted, the Commissioner considered the assessee&#039;s immovable properties, rental and agricultural income, and prior adjustments against earlier dues before refusing waiver. As the record showed application of the relevant factors and no material indicating arbitrariness or unjustness, the refusal to waive interest was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13663</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>