<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (3) TMI 232 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13660</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petitions challenging assessment orders for the years 1999-2000 and 2000-01, citing lack of jurisdiction and violation of natural justice. The court held that the respondent had considered the issues during assessment, emphasizing the availability of an alternative remedy through the appellate process. The court found no extraordinary circumstances warranting intervention, leading to the dismissal of the petitions. The petitioner was granted the opportunity to appeal within thirty days.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 11:23:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=52669" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (3) TMI 232 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13660</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petitions challenging assessment orders for the years 1999-2000 and 2000-01, citing lack of jurisdiction and violation of natural justice. The court held that the respondent had considered the issues during assessment, emphasizing the availability of an alternative remedy through the appellate process. The court found no extraordinary circumstances warranting intervention, leading to the dismissal of the petitions. The petitioner was granted the opportunity to appeal within thirty days.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13660</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>