<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (1) TMI 159 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13659</link>
    <description>HC directed that when assessing authority rejects objections to reopening under s.148, it must not take further action for four weeks from service of the rejection order on the assessee, to allow effective remedy; assessments issued within that interval are premature. Petitions challenging prior practice were disposed of on that basis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2025 15:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=52668" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (1) TMI 159 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13659</link>
      <description>HC directed that when assessing authority rejects objections to reopening under s.148, it must not take further action for four weeks from service of the rejection order on the assessee, to allow effective remedy; assessments issued within that interval are premature. Petitions challenging prior practice were disposed of on that basis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13659</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>