https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363400 The court dismissed the appeals, upholding the summons issued under the Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002. The court granted liberty to the respondents to issue fresh summons to the appellant, requiring her personal appearance. The court found no merit in the appellant's claims of bias, malice, or the applicability of Section 160 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. The court emphasized the importance of allowing the investigation to proceed smoothly and in accordance with the provisions of the Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002. en-us Tue, 10 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 12 Jul 2018 08:32:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363400 The court dismissed the appeals, upholding the summons issued under the Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002. The court granted liberty to the respondents to issue fresh summons to the appellant, requiring her personal appearance. The court found no merit in the appellant's claims of bias, malice, or the applicability of Section 160 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. The court emphasized the importance of allowing the investigation to proceed smoothly and in accordance with the provisions of the Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002. Case-Laws Money Laundering Tue, 10 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363400