<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 707 - ATPMLA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363399</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and Provisional Attachment Order, holding that the properties mortgaged with the Appellant Bank were not &quot;proceeds of crime.&quot; The Bank, as a secured creditor, was granted priority over claims under the PMLA. The Tribunal directed the Bank to move its claim before the Special Court for property disposal. The appeal was disposed of, with parties instructed not to sell or dispose of the property until further orders from the Special Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2018 08:32:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=526644" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 707 - ATPMLA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363399</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and Provisional Attachment Order, holding that the properties mortgaged with the Appellant Bank were not &quot;proceeds of crime.&quot; The Bank, as a secured creditor, was granted priority over claims under the PMLA. The Tribunal directed the Bank to move its claim before the Special Court for property disposal. The appeal was disposed of, with parties instructed not to sell or dispose of the property until further orders from the Special Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363399</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>