<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 706 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363398</link>
    <description>The court found the appellant proved the cheque was issued to discharge a legally recoverable debt. The respondent&#039;s defense was deemed implausible and unsubstantiated, failing to rebut the presumption under Section 139 of the NI Act. The judgment was set aside, and the respondent was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2018 15:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=526643" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 706 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363398</link>
      <description>The court found the appellant proved the cheque was issued to discharge a legally recoverable debt. The respondent&#039;s defense was deemed implausible and unsubstantiated, failing to rebut the presumption under Section 139 of the NI Act. The judgment was set aside, and the respondent was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363398</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>