https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363392 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the revised service tax demand issued by the department after a two-year delay was unjustified. The appellant had already paid the original demand along with interest and penalties, satisfying their obligation. The Tribunal found no basis for the delayed corrigendum and reduced the duty demand to the amount specified in the original show cause notice. The appellant's compliance was upheld, and the validity of the revised demand and penalties imposed by the authorities was rejected. en-us Wed, 16 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 12 Jul 2018 08:31:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363392 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the revised service tax demand issued by the department after a two-year delay was unjustified. The appellant had already paid the original demand along with interest and penalties, satisfying their obligation. The Tribunal found no basis for the delayed corrigendum and reduced the duty demand to the amount specified in the original show cause notice. The appellant's compliance was upheld, and the validity of the revised demand and penalties imposed by the authorities was rejected. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 16 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363392