<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 692 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363384</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, determining that the lamination activity on HDPE/PP fabrics, paper bags, and cotton fabrics constituted manufacturing under the Central Excise Act. The decision was based on precedents and the understanding that the lamination process transformed the materials into distinct marketable products, thus exempting the appellant from the service tax demand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2018 08:31:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=526629" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 692 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363384</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, determining that the lamination activity on HDPE/PP fabrics, paper bags, and cotton fabrics constituted manufacturing under the Central Excise Act. The decision was based on precedents and the understanding that the lamination process transformed the materials into distinct marketable products, thus exempting the appellant from the service tax demand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363384</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>