https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363373 The Supreme Court upheld the classification of products, determining 20 items as ayurvedic medicines and the rest as cosmetics. The appellant faced duty evasion allegations, with penalties imposed and later set aside by the Tribunal. The Commissioner requantified duty, dropping some demands but imposing penalties and interest. The Tribunal confirmed duty requantification but set aside penalties and interest, partially allowing the appeal. The case provided clarity on product classification and penalties, resolving the dispute between the appellant and the Department. en-us Fri, 01 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 12 Jul 2018 08:30:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363373 The Supreme Court upheld the classification of products, determining 20 items as ayurvedic medicines and the rest as cosmetics. The appellant faced duty evasion allegations, with penalties imposed and later set aside by the Tribunal. The Commissioner requantified duty, dropping some demands but imposing penalties and interest. The Tribunal confirmed duty requantification but set aside penalties and interest, partially allowing the appeal. The case provided clarity on product classification and penalties, resolving the dispute between the appellant and the Department. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 01 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363373