<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 673 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363365</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeals filed by the appellant company and its director, setting aside the penalties imposed on them. The penalty on Shri Satya Narayan Dey was reduced to Rs. 3,00,000. The tribunal highlighted the lack of corroborative evidence and the improper denial of cross-examination, concluding that the Revenue did not successfully prove the allegations against the appellant company.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2018 09:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=526610" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 673 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363365</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeals filed by the appellant company and its director, setting aside the penalties imposed on them. The penalty on Shri Satya Narayan Dey was reduced to Rs. 3,00,000. The tribunal highlighted the lack of corroborative evidence and the improper denial of cross-examination, concluding that the Revenue did not successfully prove the allegations against the appellant company.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363365</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>