<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (12) TMI 120 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13652</link>
    <description>The court determined that the Tribunal&#039;s rectification of its order beyond the four-year limitation prescribed under section 254(2) of the Income-tax Act was invalid and without jurisdiction. Consequently, the rectification order and the consequential order were set aside. The court ruled in favor of the Revenue, answering the questions against the assessee, and allowed the appeal without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Aug 2024 09:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=52661" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (12) TMI 120 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13652</link>
      <description>The court determined that the Tribunal&#039;s rectification of its order beyond the four-year limitation prescribed under section 254(2) of the Income-tax Act was invalid and without jurisdiction. Consequently, the rectification order and the consequential order were set aside. The court ruled in favor of the Revenue, answering the questions against the assessee, and allowed the appeal without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13652</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>