<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 1322 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273727</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT CHENNAI dismissed Revenue&#039;s appeal due to lack of evidence showing unjust enrichment by the respondent. The doctrine of unjust enrichment applies, but Revenue failed to demonstrate how duty liability was passed on to consumers.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2018 21:59:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=526603" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 1322 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273727</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT CHENNAI dismissed Revenue&#039;s appeal due to lack of evidence showing unjust enrichment by the respondent. The doctrine of unjust enrichment applies, but Revenue failed to demonstrate how duty liability was passed on to consumers.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273727</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>