<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 1201 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273730</link>
    <description>CENVAT credit cannot be denied merely because the taxability of directors&#039; remuneration was questioned, where service tax was payable under the reverse charge mechanism from 01.07.2012 and had in fact been paid. The Tribunal noted that the sole basis for rejection was the view that no service tax was payable on the remuneration, but once payment of service tax was established and there was no finding that the amount was not deposited in the treasury, denial of credit was unjustified. The assessee was therefore entitled to the CENVAT credit on the directors&#039; remuneration-related service tax.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2018 21:59:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=526600" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 1201 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273730</link>
      <description>CENVAT credit cannot be denied merely because the taxability of directors&#039; remuneration was questioned, where service tax was payable under the reverse charge mechanism from 01.07.2012 and had in fact been paid. The Tribunal noted that the sole basis for rejection was the view that no service tax was payable on the remuneration, but once payment of service tax was established and there was no finding that the amount was not deposited in the treasury, denial of credit was unjustified. The assessee was therefore entitled to the CENVAT credit on the directors&#039; remuneration-related service tax.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273730</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>