https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273735 The court disposed of the writ petitions by directing the petitioners to pay at least 15% of the disputed demand within three months to avoid recovery proceedings. The judgment emphasized compliance with TDS requirements, including the production of necessary forms for verification, to prevent default and subsequent recovery actions. The court clarified that a blanket stay of demand is not automatic and must be supported by specific circumstances, such as a favorable decision from the Supreme Court or jurisdictional High Court. en-us Mon, 16 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 11 Jul 2018 21:59:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273735 The court disposed of the writ petitions by directing the petitioners to pay at least 15% of the disputed demand within three months to avoid recovery proceedings. The judgment emphasized compliance with TDS requirements, including the production of necessary forms for verification, to prevent default and subsequent recovery actions. The court clarified that a blanket stay of demand is not automatic and must be supported by specific circumstances, such as a favorable decision from the Supreme Court or jurisdictional High Court. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 16 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273735