<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (3) TMI 523 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273720</link>
    <description>Electricity charges may be demanded even after more than three years from consumption because liability becomes due when a valid bill is raised, not at the moment of use. A revised assessment for a defective meter must, however, follow the statutory procedure: where meter correctness is disputed, the matter must be referred to the Electrical Inspector, the affected consumer must be heard, and the supplier cannot unilaterally revise the bill. Estimation for the defective period must be made by reference to the corresponding earlier comparable period, not a later period. On these grounds, the revised demand was unsustainable and relief followed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2018 12:21:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=526542" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (3) TMI 523 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273720</link>
      <description>Electricity charges may be demanded even after more than three years from consumption because liability becomes due when a valid bill is raised, not at the moment of use. A revised assessment for a defective meter must, however, follow the statutory procedure: where meter correctness is disputed, the matter must be referred to the Electrical Inspector, the affected consumer must be heard, and the supplier cannot unilaterally revise the bill. Estimation for the defective period must be made by reference to the corresponding earlier comparable period, not a later period. On these grounds, the revised demand was unsustainable and relief followed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273720</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>