https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363321 The Appellate Court set aside the conviction and sentence of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The Court found discrepancies in the evidence, particularly regarding the chit transaction and loan transaction. The defense successfully shifted the burden of proof under Section 139 of the Act, leading to the dismissal of the Criminal Appeal. The Appellate Court's decision highlighted inconsistencies in the complainant's case and lack of evidence, ultimately upholding the Trial Court's decision to set aside the conviction and sentence. en-us Sat, 23 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 11 Jul 2018 07:43:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363321 The Appellate Court set aside the conviction and sentence of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The Court found discrepancies in the evidence, particularly regarding the chit transaction and loan transaction. The defense successfully shifted the burden of proof under Section 139 of the Act, leading to the dismissal of the Criminal Appeal. The Appellate Court's decision highlighted inconsistencies in the complainant's case and lack of evidence, ultimately upholding the Trial Court's decision to set aside the conviction and sentence. Case-Laws Indian Laws Sat, 23 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363321