https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363316 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a case concerning the availment of draw back for the export of Jute Yarn, which was alleged to have been misrepresented as Jute Twine. The Tribunal found that historical trade practices considered both products the same, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue's appeal. Consequently, the appellant's appeal was allowed, and no penalty or redemption fine was imposed, aligning with past judgments and precedents. en-us Mon, 04 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 11 Jul 2018 07:38:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363316 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a case concerning the availment of draw back for the export of Jute Yarn, which was alleged to have been misrepresented as Jute Twine. The Tribunal found that historical trade practices considered both products the same, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue's appeal. Consequently, the appellant's appeal was allowed, and no penalty or redemption fine was imposed, aligning with past judgments and precedents. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 04 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363316