<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 620 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363312</link>
    <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the classification of services as dredging services, construction of residential complexes for government bodies, and certain projects under CICS and ECIS. Demands related to specific projects were upheld. Penalties imposed were set aside, and the department&#039;s appeal for penalties under Section 78 was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2018 07:18:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=526480" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 620 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363312</link>
      <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the classification of services as dredging services, construction of residential complexes for government bodies, and certain projects under CICS and ECIS. Demands related to specific projects were upheld. Penalties imposed were set aside, and the department&#039;s appeal for penalties under Section 78 was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363312</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>