<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (1) TMI 96 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13638</link>
    <description>The High Court of ALLAHABAD ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that reassessment proceedings against Rani Dayawati Devi under section 17(2) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957 were not justified as there was no specific finding or direction regarding her ownership of the properties in question. The Court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision to quash the assessment orders, emphasizing that section 17(2) only applies when reassessment is made in consequence of a specific finding or direction in a court proceeding. The Court answered the first question in the affirmative, making the second question moot, and no costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 17:24:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=52647" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (1) TMI 96 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13638</link>
      <description>The High Court of ALLAHABAD ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that reassessment proceedings against Rani Dayawati Devi under section 17(2) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957 were not justified as there was no specific finding or direction regarding her ownership of the properties in question. The Court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision to quash the assessment orders, emphasizing that section 17(2) only applies when reassessment is made in consequence of a specific finding or direction in a court proceeding. The Court answered the first question in the affirmative, making the second question moot, and no costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13638</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>