https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363301 The appeal was filed against the Order in Original issued by the Commissioner in a De novo adjudication regarding alleged evasion of Central Excise duty on Man Made Fabrics. The appellant contested the findings, pointing out deficiencies in the investigation process and discrepancies in evidence. The issue of retraction by a partner of the firm was crucial, with the Tribunal emphasizing proper consideration of this aspect. Ultimately, the judgment concluded that the confiscation of Land, Building, Plant, and Machinery was unwarranted, leading to a remand for re-quantification of the demand based on the appeal proceedings. en-us Mon, 09 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 11 Jul 2018 07:18:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363301 The appeal was filed against the Order in Original issued by the Commissioner in a De novo adjudication regarding alleged evasion of Central Excise duty on Man Made Fabrics. The appellant contested the findings, pointing out deficiencies in the investigation process and discrepancies in evidence. The issue of retraction by a partner of the firm was crucial, with the Tribunal emphasizing proper consideration of this aspect. Ultimately, the judgment concluded that the confiscation of Land, Building, Plant, and Machinery was unwarranted, leading to a remand for re-quantification of the demand based on the appeal proceedings. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 09 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363301