<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 1726 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273700</link>
    <description>The High Court of Bombay dismissed the appeal challenging the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s order for Assessment Year 2008-09 on the addition of mark to market loss on a foreign exchange forward contract. The court held that the question raised by the Revenue did not amount to a substantial question of law, in line with its previous decision in a similar case. Consequently, the appeal was rejected without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2018 06:17:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=526444" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 1726 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273700</link>
      <description>The High Court of Bombay dismissed the appeal challenging the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s order for Assessment Year 2008-09 on the addition of mark to market loss on a foreign exchange forward contract. The court held that the question raised by the Revenue did not amount to a substantial question of law, in line with its previous decision in a similar case. Consequently, the appeal was rejected without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273700</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>