<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 1659 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273711</link>
    <description>The ITAT Mumbai allowed the appeal in part, overturning the addition of Rs. 10,00,000 treated as unexplained cash credit under sections 68/69A of the Income Tax Act. The tribunal found the appellant provided sufficient evidence establishing the genuineness and legitimacy of the loan, including repayment through cheques, leading to the rejection of the AO&#039;s addition based on accommodation entries.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2018 06:17:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=526433" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 1659 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273711</link>
      <description>The ITAT Mumbai allowed the appeal in part, overturning the addition of Rs. 10,00,000 treated as unexplained cash credit under sections 68/69A of the Income Tax Act. The tribunal found the appellant provided sufficient evidence establishing the genuineness and legitimacy of the loan, including repayment through cheques, leading to the rejection of the AO&#039;s addition based on accommodation entries.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273711</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>