https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273714 The Bombay High Court admitted the appeal on the first substantial question of law, indicating that it required examination on merits. It also noted that the second substantial question had already been decided in an earlier judgment of the same Court and therefore did not call for fresh adjudication in the present proceeding. The appeal was further directed to be heard together with the connected income-tax appeals to ensure consolidated consideration of overlapping issues. en-us Tue, 07 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 11 Jul 2018 06:17:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273714 The Bombay High Court admitted the appeal on the first substantial question of law, indicating that it required examination on merits. It also noted that the second substantial question had already been decided in an earlier judgment of the same Court and therefore did not call for fresh adjudication in the present proceeding. The appeal was further directed to be heard together with the connected income-tax appeals to ensure consolidated consideration of overlapping issues. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 07 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273714