https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273697 Preventive detention orders may withstand challenge where the record shows staged forwarding of material, contemporaneous consideration by the detaining authority, and a continuing investigation that explains any interval between the prejudicial acts and the orders. A fresh post-incident act is not necessary if the material discloses an organised and continuing course of prejudicial conduct, so the live link and nexus remain intact. The sufficiency of material is not reappraised in habeas corpus proceedings where the decision rests on relevant documents, statements, and corroborative records supporting subjective satisfaction. On that basis, the detention orders were upheld and the writ petitions dismissed. en-us Fri, 10 Oct 1997 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 10 Jul 2018 17:51:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273697 Preventive detention orders may withstand challenge where the record shows staged forwarding of material, contemporaneous consideration by the detaining authority, and a continuing investigation that explains any interval between the prejudicial acts and the orders. A fresh post-incident act is not necessary if the material discloses an organised and continuing course of prejudicial conduct, so the live link and nexus remain intact. The sufficiency of material is not reappraised in habeas corpus proceedings where the decision rests on relevant documents, statements, and corroborative records supporting subjective satisfaction. On that basis, the detention orders were upheld and the writ petitions dismissed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 10 Oct 1997 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273697