https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363281 The court upheld the legality of the arrest under Section 69 of the CGST Act, 2017, finding that the petitioners were involved in fraudulent activities leading to revenue loss. The court determined that the Additional Director General had a reasonable belief for the arrest, authorized under the Act. Granting bail, the court imposed stringent conditions reflecting the seriousness of economic offenses, emphasizing compliance with investigative requirements. The judgment balanced the gravity of the offenses with the statutory right to bail, ultimately allowing the bail applications and directing the petitioners to fulfill specified obligations. en-us Mon, 09 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 07 Feb 2019 15:01:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363281 The court upheld the legality of the arrest under Section 69 of the CGST Act, 2017, finding that the petitioners were involved in fraudulent activities leading to revenue loss. The court determined that the Additional Director General had a reasonable belief for the arrest, authorized under the Act. Granting bail, the court imposed stringent conditions reflecting the seriousness of economic offenses, emphasizing compliance with investigative requirements. The judgment balanced the gravity of the offenses with the statutory right to bail, ultimately allowing the bail applications and directing the petitioners to fulfill specified obligations. Case-Laws GST Mon, 09 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363281