https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273692 The Supreme Court intervened under Article 136 and quashed the rejection of a contract carriage permit renewal due to lack of evidence and untenable reasoning. The Court directed the State Transport Authority to reconsider the renewal within two weeks, emphasizing the importance of fair consideration and upholding fundamental rights in administrative decisions. The judgment aimed to rectify the denial of renewal, ensuring a just process for the appellant and highlighting the significance of fundamental rights in permit decisions. en-us Wed, 06 Sep 1978 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 10 Jul 2018 12:44:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273692 The Supreme Court intervened under Article 136 and quashed the rejection of a contract carriage permit renewal due to lack of evidence and untenable reasoning. The Court directed the State Transport Authority to reconsider the renewal within two weeks, emphasizing the importance of fair consideration and upholding fundamental rights in administrative decisions. The judgment aimed to rectify the denial of renewal, ensuring a just process for the appellant and highlighting the significance of fundamental rights in permit decisions. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 06 Sep 1978 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273692