<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 574 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363266</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, and the issue was remitted back to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration in accordance with the law. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of due process, evidence-based assessments, and the right to cross-examination in tax matters. The judgment underscored the significance of fair treatment and procedural fairness in determining tax liabilities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2018 12:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=526384" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 574 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363266</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, and the issue was remitted back to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration in accordance with the law. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of due process, evidence-based assessments, and the right to cross-examination in tax matters. The judgment underscored the significance of fair treatment and procedural fairness in determining tax liabilities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363266</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>