https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363245 The Court concluded that the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) had the jurisdiction to grant interim orders, including the provisional release of goods pending appeal. Relying on Rules 4, 28C, and 41 of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (Procedure) Rules, 1982, the Court emphasized the Tribunal's authority to consider and decide on such applications. As the Tribunal was deemed competent to address interim matters during the appeal process, the Court dismissed the writ petition, allowing the parties to pursue their remedies within the legal framework. en-us Fri, 15 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 10 Jul 2018 07:31:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363245 The Court concluded that the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) had the jurisdiction to grant interim orders, including the provisional release of goods pending appeal. Relying on Rules 4, 28C, and 41 of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (Procedure) Rules, 1982, the Court emphasized the Tribunal's authority to consider and decide on such applications. As the Tribunal was deemed competent to address interim matters during the appeal process, the Court dismissed the writ petition, allowing the parties to pursue their remedies within the legal framework. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 15 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363245