<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 550 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363242</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the rejection of the refund claim for excess Customs duty paid on the export of iron ore fines. The appellant&#039;s claim was denied due to discrepancies in declared Fe content, improper sampling methods, and filing the claim beyond the statutory time limit specified in Section 27 of the Customs Act, 1962. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of official samples and compliance with legal time limits, ultimately ruling that the appellant was not entitled to a refund of the excess duty paid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2020 13:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=526358" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 550 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363242</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the rejection of the refund claim for excess Customs duty paid on the export of iron ore fines. The appellant&#039;s claim was denied due to discrepancies in declared Fe content, improper sampling methods, and filing the claim beyond the statutory time limit specified in Section 27 of the Customs Act, 1962. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of official samples and compliance with legal time limits, ultimately ruling that the appellant was not entitled to a refund of the excess duty paid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363242</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>