<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 533 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363225</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the levy of service tax on the incentive received for using the AMEDEUS software by a travel agency, rejecting arguments of lack of enforceable contract and awareness of terms. However, penalties were set aside under section 80 of the Finance Act due to the interpretational nature of the issue. The tribunal allowed the appeal in part, setting aside penalties while maintaining the demand for service tax and interest, providing consequential relief if applicable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2018 07:31:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=526338" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 533 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363225</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the levy of service tax on the incentive received for using the AMEDEUS software by a travel agency, rejecting arguments of lack of enforceable contract and awareness of terms. However, penalties were set aside under section 80 of the Finance Act due to the interpretational nature of the issue. The tribunal allowed the appeal in part, setting aside penalties while maintaining the demand for service tax and interest, providing consequential relief if applicable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363225</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>