<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 530 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363222</link>
    <description>Penalty was held unsustainable where the assessee had already paid the service tax and continued filing returns, and the record showed no material indicating suppression of facts, fraud, or wilful misstatement. In the absence of proof of culpable conduct with intent to evade tax, the penal provision could not be invoked. The penalty was therefore set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2018 07:31:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=526335" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 530 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363222</link>
      <description>Penalty was held unsustainable where the assessee had already paid the service tax and continued filing returns, and the record showed no material indicating suppression of facts, fraud, or wilful misstatement. In the absence of proof of culpable conduct with intent to evade tax, the penal provision could not be invoked. The penalty was therefore set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363222</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>