<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 524 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363216</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the impugned order, confirming the clandestine removal of copper ingots by the appellant and the associated demand for Rs. 66,29,476/- along with interest and an equal penalty under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act. The Tribunal found no infirmity in the order under challenge, emphasizing that the appellant failed to produce any evidence to prove their innocence and that the penalty imposed was justified. The appeal was accordingly rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2018 07:30:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=526327" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 524 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363216</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the impugned order, confirming the clandestine removal of copper ingots by the appellant and the associated demand for Rs. 66,29,476/- along with interest and an equal penalty under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act. The Tribunal found no infirmity in the order under challenge, emphasizing that the appellant failed to produce any evidence to prove their innocence and that the penalty imposed was justified. The appeal was accordingly rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363216</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>