<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 519 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363211</link>
    <description>Central excise duty was proposed on the VAT/CST subsidy received by a manufacturer, raising the question whether such subsidy formed part of the assessable value. The Tribunal followed its earlier order on the same issue and held that the subsidy value could not be included for excise purposes. As the duty demand failed, the consequential penalty was also not sustainable and was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2018 07:30:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=526320" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 519 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363211</link>
      <description>Central excise duty was proposed on the VAT/CST subsidy received by a manufacturer, raising the question whether such subsidy formed part of the assessable value. The Tribunal followed its earlier order on the same issue and held that the subsidy value could not be included for excise purposes. As the duty demand failed, the consequential penalty was also not sustainable and was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363211</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>