https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363210 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a case involving the clearance of cement to SEZ developers without payment of excise duty. It held that such clearances did not amount to clearance of exempted goods under Rule 2(d) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, entitling benefits under Rule 6(6). The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief. The Tribunal also ruled in favor of the appellant regarding the reversal of CENVAT credit availed on common input services, finding the impugned order unsustainable and requiring to be set aside. en-us Tue, 08 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 10 Jul 2018 07:30:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363210 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a case involving the clearance of cement to SEZ developers without payment of excise duty. It held that such clearances did not amount to clearance of exempted goods under Rule 2(d) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, entitling benefits under Rule 6(6). The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief. The Tribunal also ruled in favor of the appellant regarding the reversal of CENVAT credit availed on common input services, finding the impugned order unsustainable and requiring to be set aside. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 08 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363210