<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 516 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363208</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals filed by the appellant company, setting aside the impugned Order that confirmed the demand of Central Excise duty and penalties for allegedly availing Cenvat Credit on imports from a company with disputed existence. The Tribunal found the denial of credit based on a third-party report unjustified, emphasizing the necessity of examining evidence thoroughly. The decision underscored the importance of proper verification before making determinations solely relying on third-party information.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2018 07:30:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=526317" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 516 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363208</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals filed by the appellant company, setting aside the impugned Order that confirmed the demand of Central Excise duty and penalties for allegedly availing Cenvat Credit on imports from a company with disputed existence. The Tribunal found the denial of credit based on a third-party report unjustified, emphasizing the necessity of examining evidence thoroughly. The decision underscored the importance of proper verification before making determinations solely relying on third-party information.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363208</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>