<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 513 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363205</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the demand of service tax on Nostro transactions after 18.04.2006 but set aside the penalty. For SWIFT transactions, the demand before 18.04.2006 was set aside, while the demand after that date was upheld, with the penalty also set aside. The demand for service tax on Vostro transactions was entirely set aside. The appellant&#039;s appeal was disposed of accordingly, with any consequential reliefs granted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2018 16:47:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=526282" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 513 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363205</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the demand of service tax on Nostro transactions after 18.04.2006 but set aside the penalty. For SWIFT transactions, the demand before 18.04.2006 was set aside, while the demand after that date was upheld, with the penalty also set aside. The demand for service tax on Vostro transactions was entirely set aside. The appellant&#039;s appeal was disposed of accordingly, with any consequential reliefs granted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363205</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>