<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (7) TMI 179 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13619</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the expenses of Rs. 1,71,791 claimed by the State Bank of Bikaner &amp;amp; Jaipur as entertainment expenses were justified as business development expenditure. The court found the amount reasonable for entertaining customers and visitors across the bank&#039;s 400 branches. The Tribunal&#039;s decision to treat the expenses as business development expenditure was upheld, emphasizing that the assessing authority should consider the specific circumstances of each case in determining whether entertainment expenses can be classified as business development expenditure. The reference to the High Court was deemed unjustified, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 16:46:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=52628" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (7) TMI 179 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13619</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the expenses of Rs. 1,71,791 claimed by the State Bank of Bikaner &amp;amp; Jaipur as entertainment expenses were justified as business development expenditure. The court found the amount reasonable for entertaining customers and visitors across the bank&#039;s 400 branches. The Tribunal&#039;s decision to treat the expenses as business development expenditure was upheld, emphasizing that the assessing authority should consider the specific circumstances of each case in determining whether entertainment expenses can be classified as business development expenditure. The reference to the High Court was deemed unjustified, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13619</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>