<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (8) TMI 166 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13618</link>
    <description>The High Court held that without evidence of discrepancies in the post-search period, no presumption of unaccounted sales continuing throughout the year could be made. The Revenue failed to establish any substantial question of law, leading to the dismissal of the appeal filed under section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 16:45:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=52627" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (8) TMI 166 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13618</link>
      <description>The High Court held that without evidence of discrepancies in the post-search period, no presumption of unaccounted sales continuing throughout the year could be made. The Revenue failed to establish any substantial question of law, leading to the dismissal of the appeal filed under section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13618</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>