<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 477 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363169</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision regarding royalty payments to associated enterprises, emphasizing the need for proper assessment methods and rejecting the TPO&#039;s determination of NIL Arm&#039;s Length Price. Additionally, the Court supported the Tribunal&#039;s treatment of Trading and Manufacturing segments as integrated for determining the Arm&#039;s Length Price, citing consistency with previous rulings. The Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, stating that mere dissatisfaction with the Tribunal&#039;s findings does not warrant invoking Section 260-A, as no substantial question of law emerged, leading to the appeal being deemed devoid of merit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2018 08:25:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=526212" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 477 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363169</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision regarding royalty payments to associated enterprises, emphasizing the need for proper assessment methods and rejecting the TPO&#039;s determination of NIL Arm&#039;s Length Price. Additionally, the Court supported the Tribunal&#039;s treatment of Trading and Manufacturing segments as integrated for determining the Arm&#039;s Length Price, citing consistency with previous rulings. The Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, stating that mere dissatisfaction with the Tribunal&#039;s findings does not warrant invoking Section 260-A, as no substantial question of law emerged, leading to the appeal being deemed devoid of merit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363169</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>