<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 473 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363165</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision in the case, affirming the reduction of expenses from both export turnover and total turnover to avoid unjust results. The Tribunal&#039;s exclusion of certain companies as comparables in Transfer Pricing analysis was also upheld, based on functional dissimilarity, extraordinary events, and financial data reliability. Additionally, the Tribunal&#039;s confirmation of a standard deduction of +/- 5% under Section 92C(2) was deemed appropriate, as per the pre-amended proviso applicable to assessments concluded before a specified date. The Court found no substantial questions of law and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2018 08:25:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=526208" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 473 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363165</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision in the case, affirming the reduction of expenses from both export turnover and total turnover to avoid unjust results. The Tribunal&#039;s exclusion of certain companies as comparables in Transfer Pricing analysis was also upheld, based on functional dissimilarity, extraordinary events, and financial data reliability. Additionally, the Tribunal&#039;s confirmation of a standard deduction of +/- 5% under Section 92C(2) was deemed appropriate, as per the pre-amended proviso applicable to assessments concluded before a specified date. The Court found no substantial questions of law and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363165</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>