<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 472 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363164</link>
    <description>The Court clarified the interpretation of Section 10A of the Income Tax Act, aligning the exclusion of expenditure in foreign currency from export turnover with legislative intent. It upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to exclude certain companies with significant related party transactions under TNMM for determining arm&#039;s length price. The Court supported the exclusion of companies with RPT exceeding 15% of total sales/revenue and directed the TPO to re-examine comparability based on previous findings. The appeal under Section 260-A was deemed not maintainable as no substantial question of law arose, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2018 08:25:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=526207" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 472 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363164</link>
      <description>The Court clarified the interpretation of Section 10A of the Income Tax Act, aligning the exclusion of expenditure in foreign currency from export turnover with legislative intent. It upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to exclude certain companies with significant related party transactions under TNMM for determining arm&#039;s length price. The Court supported the exclusion of companies with RPT exceeding 15% of total sales/revenue and directed the TPO to re-examine comparability based on previous findings. The appeal under Section 260-A was deemed not maintainable as no substantial question of law arose, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363164</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>