https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363148 Preventive detention was invalid where the authority failed to show conscious and full consideration of all relied-upon material before recording subjective satisfaction. The record indicated that documents were supplied piecemeal, with additional material reaching the detaining authority even up to the date of the detention order, while the affidavits were vague and contradictory as to what was received when. On that defective record, the HC held that the order suffered from total non-application of mind and could not be sustained; the detention order was quashed and release directed if the detenu was not otherwise required. en-us Fri, 27 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 09 Jul 2018 08:23:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363148 Preventive detention was invalid where the authority failed to show conscious and full consideration of all relied-upon material before recording subjective satisfaction. The record indicated that documents were supplied piecemeal, with additional material reaching the detaining authority even up to the date of the detention order, while the affidavits were vague and contradictory as to what was received when. On that defective record, the HC held that the order suffered from total non-application of mind and could not be sustained; the detention order was quashed and release directed if the detenu was not otherwise required. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 27 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363148