<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 453 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363145</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the penalties imposed on the appellants. The judgment emphasized the importance of following valuation rules sequentially, rejecting transaction value with tangible evidence before enhancing the value of imported goods. The lack of evidence to establish lower value justified overturning the penalties based on undervaluation allegations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2018 08:23:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=526188" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 453 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363145</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the penalties imposed on the appellants. The judgment emphasized the importance of following valuation rules sequentially, rejecting transaction value with tangible evidence before enhancing the value of imported goods. The lack of evidence to establish lower value justified overturning the penalties based on undervaluation allegations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363145</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>