<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 441 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363133</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the demand under &#039;Rent-a-Cab Service&#039; as it had been dropped in an earlier notice. The demand for &#039;Tour Operator&#039; charges before 10.09.04 was also set aside, but upheld for the period after that date. The demand for &#039;Management Consultancy Services&#039; was accepted. The appeal was partly allowed, modifying the original order accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2018 08:22:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=526176" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 441 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363133</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the demand under &#039;Rent-a-Cab Service&#039; as it had been dropped in an earlier notice. The demand for &#039;Tour Operator&#039; charges before 10.09.04 was also set aside, but upheld for the period after that date. The demand for &#039;Management Consultancy Services&#039; was accepted. The appeal was partly allowed, modifying the original order accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363133</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>